🔗 Share this article

In the eyes of a lifelong Dodgers fan and third-generation Mexican American, the crowning moment of the World Series did not happen during the nail-biting finale last Saturday, when her squad pulled off one dramatic comeback act after another and then winning in extra innings against the Toronto Blue Jays.

It came in the previous game, when two supporting players, the Puerto Rican player and Miguel Rojas, pulled off a electrifying, decisive sequence that simultaneously challenged many harmful stereotypes touted about Latinos in recent years.

The play in itself was stunning: the outfielder charged in from the outfield to catch a ball he initially misjudged in the bright lights, then fired it to the infield to record another, game-winning play. the second baseman, positioned nearby, received the ball just a split second before a runner collided with him, knocking him to the ground.

This was not just a remarkable athletic achievement, perhaps the decisive turn in momentum in the team's direction after looking for much of the games like the underdog side. For Molina, it was thrilling, on multiple levels, a much-required morale boost for the community and for Los Angeles after months of enforcement actions, troops patrolling the neighborhoods, and a constant stream of negativity from official sources.

"The players put forth this counter-narrative," said the professor. "The world saw Latinos displaying an infectious enthusiasm in what they do, being leaders on the team, having a different kind of confidence. They're energetic, they're yelling, they're taking off their shirts."

"It was such a juxtaposition with what we observe on the news – raids, Latinos detained and chased down. It's so simple to be demoralized these days."

Not that it's exactly straightforward to be a team supporter nowadays – for her or for the many of other fans who show up regularly to home games and occupy as many as 50% of the venue's 50,000 spots per game.

A Complicated Connection with the Organization

When intensified immigration raids started in the city in early June, and national guard troops were deployed into the city to react to ensuing demonstrations, two of the city's soccer clubs quickly released messages of support with immigrant families – but not the Dodgers.

Management has said the organization prefer to steer clear of politics – a view colored, perhaps, by the fact that a significant minority of the supporters, including Latinos, are supporters of current political figures. After considerable public pressure, the team later pledged $one million in aid for individuals personally affected by the raids but issued no official criticism of the government.

White House Visit and Historical Legacy

Three months before, the team did not hesitate in agreeing to an offer to mark their previous World Series victory at the White House – a move that local columnists described as "disappointing … weak … and contradictory", given the team's boast in having been the pioneering major league franchise to end the color barrier in the mid-20th century and the regular invocations of that history and the values it embodies by officials and current and past athletes. A number of players including the coach had voiced unwillingness to travel to the White House during the first term but either reconsidered or gave in to demands from the organization.

Corporate Control and Fan Dilemmas

An additional complication for supporters is that the team are owned by a large investment group, the ownership group, whose investments, according to sources and its own published balance sheets, include a stake in a detention corporation that operates detention centers. Guggenheim's executives has said many times that it wants to stay out of politics, but its critics say the inaction – and the investment – are their own type of acquiescence to certain agendas.

These factors contribute to significant mixed feelings among Hispanic fans in particular – sentiments that surfaced even in the euphoria of this year's hard-fought World Series triumph and the ensuing outpouring of team pride across Los Angeles.

"Can one to root for the team?" local columnist one observer reflected at the beginning of the playoffs in an elegant essay ruminating on "Dodger blue in our blood, but uncertainty in our minds". He couldn't finally bring himself to watch the World Series, but he still cared strongly, to the extent that he believed his personal boycott must have brought the team the luck it required to win.

Distinguishing the Team from the Owners

Many fans who share Galindo's misgivings seem to have decided that they can keep to back the team and its roster of international stars, including the Asian megastar Shohei Ohtani, while pouring scorn on the team's business overlords. Nowhere was this more clear than at the championship parade at the home venue on the following day, when the packed audience cheered in support of the manager and his players but jeered the team president and the top official of the investors.

"The executives in suits don't get to claim our boys in blue from us," Molina said. "We have been with the team longer than they have."

Historical Context and Community Impact

The issue, though, runs deeper than only the organization's present proprietors. The agreement that brought the Brooklyn Dodgers to the city in the 1950s involved the municipality demolishing three low-income Latino communities on a elevated area above downtown and then transferring the property to the organization for a fraction of its market value. A song on a mid-2000s album that chronicles the story has an impoverished parking attendant at the venue revealing that the house he lost to removal is now third base.

A prominent commentator, perhaps the region's most widely followed Mexican American writer and broadcaster, sees a darker side to the long, dysfunctional dynamic between the team and its audience. He calls the Dodgers the Flamin' Hot Cheetos of baseball, "a corporate entity with an excessive, even harmful devotion by numerous Latinos" that has been exploiting its fans for years.

"They have put one arm around Hispanic followers while profiting from them with the other hand for so long because they have been able to avoid consequences," the writer noted over the warmer months, when calls to boycott the team over its absence of response to the enforcement actions were upended by the awkward reality that turnout at matches did not dip, even at the peak of the protests when the city center was under to a evening restriction.

International Stars and Community Bonds

Distinguishing the squad from its business leadership is not a easy matter, {