🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold forecast – going beyond the winner citywide, and block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in the city, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the system frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in after that and his lead went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday went somewhat badly for him, in which the opponent was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However the winner added 500,000 votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, renters and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president previously backed Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the record participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I thought it could exceed two million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over half. He has just over 50% but remain probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he does because afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That really was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many conservatives on the island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there was some opposition. However overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that every city in America can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.