🔗 Share this article

In spite of all the established advances of modern medicine, certain people are drawn to alternative or “holistic” cures and practices. A number of these are not dangerous. As a cancer specialist observed recently, people receiving cancer treatment will often try meditation or vitamins too. When such a change is alongside, and not instead of, evidence-based treatment, this is usually not a problem. If it reduces distress, it can help.

The Rise of Digital Health Figures

But the proliferation of online health influencers poses challenges that authorities and regulators in many countries have yet to grasp. A recent inquiry into a particular business offering membership and advice to expectant mothers has exposed numerous cases of late-term stillbirths or other serious harm involving mothers or birth attendants linked with it. While the entity is headquartered in North Carolina, its reach is international.

“Across whole populations, going through labour and birth without professional support is linked to higher levels of risk for mother and baby,” as stated by a expert of midwifery.

Understanding the Risks and Background

Giving birth without medical assistance, sometimes called free birth, is legal in nations including the UK and US. The risks are poorly documented due to a lack of reliable information. Childbirth can be a daunting experience, and high-quality care is not guaranteed. In England, a alarming recently published report found a large majority of maternity units to be unsafe or in need of improvement.

Criticisms of medical systems and specific, persistent issues with maternity care are in many cases justified. A significant number of the women interviewed for the investigation had previously undergone distressing births.

Distrust and the Proliferation of Falsehoods

But while mistrust of institutions may be rooted in experience, it has also proved to be a fertile ground for other influencers looking for followers to their unconventional methods and DIY philosophy. During the pandemic, a “wellness” industry supposedly focused on healthy living was involved in disseminating falsehoods about vaccines and feeding paranoia about government advice.

Concern is growing that such ideas are acquiring more widespread purchase. One presentation given at a medical symposium focused on misinformation, which it said had “acutely worsened in the past decade”. The inquiry shows that behind the facade of an anti-establishment sisterhood lies an enterprise that trains women as social media influencers as well as birth attendants. The organization does not present itself to be a qualified medical provider.

The Need for Protections and Improvements

There is no turning the clock back to a time when doctors were assumed to know best. Vast quantities of scientific research are published online and many people use these to beneficial effect. But there is also a need for protections from poor advice. It is widely understood that the automated systems used by tech companies promote more extreme content.

In the UK, improvements to maternity services are urgently needed. They should include the option of home birth and the provision of clear information to empower women in choosing their care. Ministers and bodies including the World Health Organization should also create plans for the information ecosystem so that science-based healthcare is not compromised.