🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking followers viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes male users who employ online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" style

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered positive results. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."