🔗 Share this article

Avril Coleridge-Taylor always felt the pressure of her family reputation. Being the child of the renowned Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, one of the most famous UK composers of the early 20th century, her name was enveloped in the deep shadows of bygone eras.

The First Recording

In recent months, I sat with these shadows as I prepared to make the inaugural album of the composer’s 1936 piano concerto. Featuring emotional harmonies, expressive melodies, and bold rhythms, her composition will provide audiences fascinating insight into how this artist – an artist in conflict originating from the early 1900s – conceived of her reality as a woman of colour.

Past and Present

But here’s the thing about legacies. It can take a while to adapt, to perceive forms as they really are, to separate fact from distortion, and I was reluctant to address her history for some time.

I deeply hoped the composer to be her father’s daughter. In some ways, she was. The idyllic English tones of Samuel’s influence can be heard in several pieces, for example From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). But you only have to examine the headings of her family’s music to see how he heard himself as not only a flag bearer of UK romantic tradition and also a representative of the African heritage.

At this point parent and child seemed to diverge.

American society assessed the composer by the mastery of his art instead of the his racial background.

Family Background

During his studies at the renowned institution, Samuel – the offspring of a Sierra Leonean father and a white English mother – turned toward his background. When the African American poet Paul Laurence Dunbar visited the UK in that era, the 21-year-old composer was keen to meet him. He composed Dunbar’s African Romances as a composition and the next year adapted his verses for an opera, Dream Lovers. Then came the choral work that established his reputation: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Drawing from the poet Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, the piece was an global success, notably for Black Americans who felt vicarious pride as American society evaluated the composer by the brilliance of his compositions rather than the his background.

Advocacy and Beliefs

Recognition did not temper his activism. During that period, he was present at the pioneering African conference in the UK where he met the prominent scholar the renowned Du Bois and saw a variety of discussions, such as the oppression of Black South Africans. He was a campaigner throughout his life. He kept connections with trailblazers for equality such as Du Bois and this leader, spoke publicly on ending discrimination, and even engaged in dialogue on racial problems with President Theodore Roosevelt while visiting to the US capital in that year. As for his music, Du Bois recalled, “he made his mark so prominently as a creative artist that it will long be remembered.” He died in the early 20th century, in his thirties. However, how would the composer have made of his child’s choice to be in the African nation in the that decade?

Controversy and Apartheid

“Daughter of Famous Composer expresses approval to South African policy,” ran a headline in the community journal Jet magazine. This policy “seems to me the appropriate course”, the composer stated Jet. Upon further questioning, she qualified her remarks: she was not in favor with this policy “fundamentally” and it “ought to be permitted to run its course, guided by well-meaning South Africans of every background”. Had Avril been more in tune to her father’s politics, or raised in the US under segregation, she could have hesitated about this system. But life had shielded her.

Background and Inexperience

“I hold a British passport,” she said, “and the officials never asked me about my race.” Therefore, with her “fair” skin (as described), she moved within European circles, supported by their acclaim for her late father. She presented about her parent’s compositions at the University of Cape Town and directed the South African Broadcasting Corporation Orchestra in that location, programming the bold final section of her concerto, subtitled: “In remembrance of my Father.” While a accomplished player herself, she never played as the featured artist in her concerto. On the contrary, she consistently conducted as the leader; and so the orchestra of the era performed under her direction.

The composer aspired, according to her, she “could introduce a change”. However, by that year, the situation collapsed. Once officials learned of her Black ancestry, she had to depart the land. Her British passport offered no defense, the British high commissioner advised her to leave or risk imprisonment. She returned to England, embarrassed as the scale of her innocence became clear. “This experience was a hard one,” she stated. Adding to her embarrassment was the 1955 publication of her controversial discussion, a year after her forced leaving from the country.

A Common Narrative

While I reflected with these legacies, I perceived a recurring theme. The account of being British until it’s challenged – which recalls African-descended soldiers who fought on behalf of the British throughout the World War II and survived only to be refused rightful benefits. Including those from Windrush,