🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to use a redrawn congressional map that may create several five additional conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three order, issued on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to lift a federal judge's block that had struck down the new map in November.

Court's Explanation

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and disturbing the sensitive balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its decision.

That lower court had determined that Texas had likely grouped voters based on their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the boundaries. It had ordered the state to use the boundaries drawn after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Strong Opposition

Through a strongly worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's decision. She stated that it disrespected the work of the district court, noting that its ruling was actually authored by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan stated in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, The majority's order ensures that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will dictate next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be grouped in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a breach of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Fight

This decision is part of a nationwide battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican majority. Typically, boundary revision occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that could add a number of more Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have countered with revised boundaries in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State AG welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes aligned with the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he remarked.

In contrast, opposition party representatives criticized the outcome. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major party campaign committee.

Another leading House figure argued the court had yet again shredded its standing by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.