🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a draft bill that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to WHO calculations.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside broader worries about business sector influence with medical guidelines. Last month, WHO officials issued a warning that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to weaken global control measures.

“Evidence exists of industry lobbying worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“Should anti-smoking legislation fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The tobacco control bill being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the company recommends this be reduced to 30% or 50% “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the law is enacted.

International experts in fact recommends a alert needs to encompass at least half of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, claiming that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for different infractions “varying from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Business explanation

In the letter, the company executive of the Zambian branch says the company is dedicated to ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but maintains that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

Chimbala said the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that many such provisions were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We exist in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my back yard and collect the yield and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative said: “The company operates its operations according with applicable local laws. Additionally, the company participates in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which provide for relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, noting that underage people should be shielded from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, noting that the corporation's recommendations “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which includes increasing amounts of black market activity”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.